Developing a fuzzy goal programming model for optimizing humanitarian supply chain operations

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Department of management, College of Human Science, Saveh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran

2 Department of management, college of human science, Saveh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran

3 Department of Industrial Management, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran


A review of natural disasters that have occurred over recent decades indicates the high costs and casualties caused by them for governments and societies arousing concerns in this field. In this regard, making proper decisions and taking appropriate and real-time measures in each phase of the crisis management cycle can re-duce possible damages during disasters and decrease the vulnerability of society. Hence, the present study aims to propose a fuzzy goal programming (FGP) model in the primary and secondary stages of disasters. The primary stage is aimed at providing disaster-affected areas with relief services and commodities while the purpose of the secondary stage is to provide disaster centers with aid and transfer the injured to relief centers. The proposed mathematical model has been validated using the FGP approach and the NSGAII metaheuristic algorithm and adjusting the parameters of the Taguchi method. The results reveal that the proposed model can improve the programming and flexibility of relief measures in disaster-affected areas in both primary and secondary stages. It is also found that the use of the metaheuristic algorithm facilitates the evaluation and decision-making procedures in big disasters and verifies the efficiency of the algorithm in large dimensions.


Chapman, A. G., and Mitchell, J. E. (2018). A fair division approach to humanitarian logistics inspired by conditional value-at-risk. Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 262(1), pp. 133-151.
Cao, C., Li, C., Yang, Q., Liu, Y., and Qu, T. (2018). A novel multi-objective programming model of relief distribution for sustainable disaster supply chain in large-scale natural disasters. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 174, pp. 1422-1435.
Cavdur, F, Kose-Kucuk, M, and Sebatli, A. (2016), Allocation of temporary disaster response facilities under demand uncertainty: An earthquake case study, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 19, pp. 159–166
Douglas A, Alistair C, and Alfredo M, (2016), Stochastic Network Models for Logistics Planning in Disaster Relief. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 255(1), pp. 187–206.
Erbeyoğlu, G., and Bilge, Ü. (2020). A robust disaster preparedness model for effective and fair disaster response. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 280(2), pp. 479-494.
Fathalikhani, S., Hafezalkotob, A., and Soltani, S. (2019). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,
Gul Qureshi, A., and Taniguchi, E. (2020). A multi-period humanitarian logistics model considering limited resources and network availability. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 46 (2020), pp. 212–219.
Goli, A., and Bakhshi, M. (2017). A Review on Main Challenges of Disaster Relief Supply Chain to Reduce Casualties in Case of Natural Disasters. Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, Vol. 4(2), pp.77-88.
Inuiguchi M, and Ramık J (2000) Possibilistic linear programming a brief review of fuzzy mathematical
 programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem. Fuzzy sets Systems, Vol.111, pp. 3-28
Jha, A., Acharya, D., and Tiwari, M. K. (2017). Humanitarian relief supply chain: a multi-objective model and solution. Sādhanā, Vol.42 (7), pp. 1167-1174.
Mahootchi, M, Khatami, M., and Farahani, R. Z. (2017). Benders’ decomposition ‎for ‎concurrent ‎redesign of forward and closed-loop supply chain network with ‎demand and ‎return ‎uncertainties. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and ‎Transportation Review, Vol.79, ‌‎ pp. 1-‌‎21‌‏. ‏
Mohammadi, R, Fatemi Ghomi, S.M.T., and Jolai, F, (2016), Pre-positioning Emergency Supplies for Earthquake Response: A New Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 40)9(, pp. 5183-5199
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Albores, P., and Brewster, C. (2018). Disaster preparedness in humanitarian logistics: A collaborative approach for resource management in floods. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 264(3), pp. 978-993.
Samani, M. R. G., Torabi, S. A., and Hosseini-Motlagh, S. M. (2018). Integrated blood supply chain planning for disaster relief. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol 27, pp. 168-188.
Song, J. M., Chen, W., and Lei, L. (2018). Supply chain flexibility and operations optimisation under demand uncertainty: a case in disaster relief. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 56, pp. 1-15.
Salehi, F, Mahootchi, M, and Moattar Husseini, (2017), S.M, Developing a Robust Stochastic Model for Designing a Blood Supply Chain Network in a Crisis: A Possible Earthquake in Tehran, Ann Oper Res, Vol. 283, pp. 1-25
Vahdani, B., Veysmoradi, D., Noori, F., and Mansour, F. (2018). Two-stage multi-objective location-routing-inventory model for humanitarian logistics network design under uncertainty. International journal of disaster risk reduction, Vol. 27, pp. 290-306.
Xu, J, Yin, X, Chen, D, and Nie, G, (2016), Multi-Criteria Location Model of Earthquake Evacuation Shelters to Aid in Urban Planning, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 20, pp. 51-62
Yu, L., Zhang, C., Yang, H., and Miao, L. (2018). Novel methods for resource allocation in humanitarian logistics considering human suffering. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 119, pp. 1-20.
Zahiri, B. Torabi, S.A., and Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2017), A Novel Multi-Stage Possibilistic Stochastic Programming Approach (with an Application in Relief Distribution Planning). Information Sciences, Vol. 385, pp. 225-249
Zokaee, S., Bozorgi-Amiri, A., and Sadjadi, S. J. (2016). A robust optimization model for humanitarian relief chain design under uncertainty. Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 40(17-18), pp. 7996-8016.