Evaluation of Transportation Distance Optimization Route for Milk Run Logistics System

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Smart Manufacturing Research Institute, School of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.

2 Proton Berhad, Shah Alam, Malaysia

3 Smart Manufacturing Research Institute, School of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA

4 Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Pulau Pinang, Kampus Permatang Pauh. Pulau Pinang, Malaysia

Abstract

An efficient logistic system has become more important in today’s business process. Milk run system is being introduced to encourage efficient logistic system in manufacturing which has indirectly resulted in a reduction of transportation cost, travelling path, as well as fuel consumption. However, the poor optimal state of the original delivery route and low vehicle loading rate has a huge impact on the production effectiveness. The objective of this study is to evaluate the current milk run route, optimize the transportation volume capacity and propose a transportation route for the milk run logistics system. The milk run concept is introduced to deliver components to the production line from multiple suppliers. This approach is based on the Just-In-Time concept promoted by Toyota Production System where the small batch is delivered to the production line to reduce the side inventory. A high frequency of delivery is required. Therefore, the load for each of the delivery needs to be calculated to achieve maximum load with minimum inventory. The Saving Matrix Method based on Tabu Search model and Ant Colony Optimization model is used to evaluate the current milk run route. The result of the analysis showed an unutilized capacity of 49% that can be reduced to 3% with a distance deviation between 0% for direct milk run route and 2.0% to 6.8% for indirect milk run route. The managerial suggestions that can increase the logistics efficiency of the milk run are provided to benefit the organization by reducing the total logistics cost.

Keywords


Adewole, A., Otubamowo, K., & Egunjobi, T. O. (2012). A Comparative Study of Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithm for Solving the Travelling Salesman Problem. International Journal of Applied Information Systems, 4, PP.6-12.
 
Alhamdy, S. A. S, Noudehi, A. N., & Majdara, M. (2012). Solving Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) using Ants Colony(ACO) Algorithm and comparing with Tabu Search, Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithm.Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8(1), PP.434-440.
 
Aunyawong, W, Wararatchai, P., Shaharudin, M. R., Hirunpat, A., & Rodpangwan, S. (2021). The Mediating Role of Transportation Practices during the COVID-19 Crisis in Thailand. The Open Transportation Journal, 15, PP.170-181.
 
Basu, S. (2012). Tabu Search Implementation on Traveling Salesman Problem and Its Variations: A Literature Survey. American Journal of Operations Research, 2(2), PP.163-173.
 
Berman, O., & Wang, Q. (2006). Inbound Logistics Planning: Minimizing Transportation and Inventory Cost. Transportation Science, 40(3), PP.287-299.
 
Busatlic, S. (2013). Implementation of Transportation Problem by Using the Method of Meta- Heuristics Approach. International Conference on Economic and Social Studies (ICESoS'13), 10-11 May, 2013, Sarajevo. 
 
Chopra, S. (2019). Supply Chain Management Strategy, Planning and Operation. Pearson.
 
Dhiba, Y., & Velda, A. (2017). Supply Chain Management performance in automotive sector: Case of Morocco. International Colloquium on Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA), PP.106-111,
 doi: 10.1109/LOGISTIQUA.2017.7962882.
 
Elias, O. B, María, B. B. L, Santiago, O. C. M, Rafael, G. M .C (2021). Multi-objective Design of Balanced Sales
Territories with Taboo Search: A Practical. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 8(2), PP. 176-193.
 
Glover, Fred & Laguna, Manuel & Marti, Rafael. (2008). Tabu Search. 10.1007/978-1-4615-6089-0.
Iriani, Y., & Asmara, H. (2020). Cost Optimization In Determining The Distribution Route Of Fabric Product Using the Saving Matrix Method. Palarch's Journal Of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, PP.3009-3020.
 
Jing, Z., Kuang, H, Leite, W. L., Marcoulides, K. M., & Fisk, C. L. (2022). Model Specification Searches in Structural Equation Modeling with a Hybrid Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, PP.1-12.
 
Kholil, M., Hendri, Mangaraja, R., & Yosan, R. (2019). Improving the Efficiency of the Milkrun Truck Suppliers in Cikarang Area by Merging the Payload Cycles and Optimizing the Milkrun Route Using the Saving Matrix Methods. International Conference on Advance and Scientific Innovation (ICASI).
 
Kou, W., & Wan, R. (2007). Recent Advances in Optimal Reliability Allocation. IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, And Cybernetics—Part A: Systems And Humans, 37(2), PP.143-156.
 doi 10.1109/TSMCA.2006.889476.
 
Kov´acs, A. (2009). Optimizing the Storage Assignment in a Warehouse Served by Milkrun Logistics. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), PP.312-318.
 
Kuhn, J. (2015). End-to-end supply chains: The solution?, In 2015 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS), Barcelona, Spain, PP. 1-3.
doi: 10.1109/LISS.2015.7369674.
 
Kurnia, N., Salsabila, S., Sihombing, S., Kharisma, I., & Anwar, A. (2021). Comparison Of Optimal Distribution Route For Personal Protection Equipment By Saving Matrix And Tabu Search Methods Using Nearest Neighbor Approach At Covid-19 Referral Hospitals In West Java. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(7), PP.2788-2797.
 
Larson, P. D., & Halldorsson, A. (2004). Logistics Versus Supply Chain Management: An International Survey. International Journal of Logistics : Research and Application. 7(1), PP.17-31.
 
Liker, J.K. (2004). The Toyota Way, 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer. McGraw Hill, New York.
 
Lin, Y., Ge, X.-l., & Shi, C.-c. (2010). Inventory-transportation Integrated Optimization Based on Mol-Run Model. 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Goverment.
 
Li, X. -Y., Tian, P., & Leung, S. C. H. (2009). An Ant Colony Optimization Metaheuristic Hybridized with Tabu S Search for Open Vehicle Routing Problems. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(7), PP. 1012– 1025.
 
Lukmandono , M Basuki, M J Hidayat, & F B Aji. (2019). Application of Saving Matrix Methods and Cross Entropy for Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) Resolving. The 1st International Conference on Advanced Engineering and Technology, 462, 012025.
 
Macsay, V., & Banyai, T. (2017). Toyota Production System In Milkrun Based In-Plant Supply. Journal of Production Engineering, 20(1), PP.141-146.
 
Maniezzo, V., Gambardella, L. M., & de Luigi, F. (2004). Ant Colony Optimization, Optimization Techniques in Engineering, Springer-Verla, Berlin.
 
Monden, Y. (2012). Toyota Production System: An Integrated Approach to Just In Time. Institute of Industrial Engineers. Productivity Press.
 
Moryadee, C., Aunyawong, W., & Shaharudin, M. R. (2019). Congestion and Pollution, Vehicle Routing Problem of a Logistics Provider in Thailand. The Open Transportation Journal, 13, PP.203-212.
 
Nemoto, T., Hayashi, K., & Hashimoto, M. (2010). Milk Run Logistics By Japanese Automobile Manufacturer in Thailand. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 2(3), PP.5980-5989.
 
Nguyen, T. H. D., & Dao, T. –M., (2015). Novel Approach to Optimize Milk-run Delivery: A Case Study. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), PP.351-355.
 
 
Panfilova, E., Dzenzeliuk, N., Domnina, O., Morgunovа, N., & Zatsarinnaya, Е. (2020). The Impact of Cost Allocation on Key Decisions of Supply Chain Participants. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(1), PP.552-558.
 
Ramos, E., Pettit, T., Flanigan, M., Romero, L., & Huayta, K. (2020). Inventory Management Model Based on Lean Supply Chain to Increase the Service Level in a Distributor of Automotive Sector. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(2), PP.113-131.
 
Rizkya, I., Matondang, N., Yahya, M. D., & Ningsih, M. S. (2019). Design of Distribution Routes Using Saving Matrix Method to Minimize Transportation Cost. International Conference on Sustainable Engineering and Creative Computing (ICSECC), PP. 48-51.
 
Shukla, R., Garg, D., & Agarwal, A. (2011). Understanding of the Supply Chain : A Literature Review. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 3(3), PP.2059-2072.
 
Simic, D., Svircevic, V., Corchado, E., Rolle, J. L., Simic, S. D., & Simic, S. (2020). Modelling material flow using the Milk runand Kanban systems in the automotive industry. Expert System. 38(1), e12546.
 
Singh Brar, G., & Saini, G. (2011). Milk Run Logistics : Literature Review and Direction. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2011 Vol I, WCE 2011, July 6 - 8, London, U.K.
 
Sugimori, Y., Kusunoki, K., Cho, F., & Uchikawa, S. (1977). Toyota production system and Kanban system Materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system. International Journal of Production Research, 15(6), PP,.553-564.
 
Suparjo (2019). Use Of The Saving Matrix Method As An ALternative For Distribution Cost Efficiency : An Empirical Study On Log Timber Companies In Central Java. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(8), PP.398-402.
 
Warr, P., & Kohpaiboon, A. (2017). Thailand's Automotive Manufacturing Corridor. ADB Economic Working Paper Series. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/411926/ewp-519-thailand-automotive-manufacturingc-corridor.pdf.
 
Zhang, X., Zou, L., & Hu, Z. (2016). The Study in Supply Chain of Auto Parts Based on Milk Run. Open Journal of Business and Management, 4(4), PP.778-783.